Cases 211 - 220 of 8,781
Jones v. YesCare Corp. et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Dewon Clarniel Jones
Defendant:
YesCare Corp. and Wilcotte Rahming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Thomas
Defendant:
Capt. Thomas, Captain Jenkins and Lt. Marvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Jones et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Clevon Randolph, Sgt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryles v. Logan et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Reginald Logan, Heath Taylor, William Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodson v. Morgan (INMATE 2)
as 1:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Ronald Andre Goodson
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramsey v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Frederico Ramsey
Defendant:
Alan Cohen and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lee v. Smithart et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
L.B. Smithart, Ben C. Reeves, Rebecca G. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Elmore County Jail (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Kedrick Lamar Murray
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
