Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Houston County et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00968
Defendant:
J. Trawick, Houston County Commissioners, Judge Derrick and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flagg v. Houston County Commission for Courts and Jail Standards et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00909
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Flagg, Chrisdeon Byrd, Carlos Blocker and others
Defendant:
Houston County Commissioners, K. Moore, Donald Valenza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Woods (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00161
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Armstrong
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Gordy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jackie N. Armstrong, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Robert Brown, T. Glanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00469
Plaintiff:
Quenterius Jamar Armstrong
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen Armstrong
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Golson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00647
Plaintiff:
Terry Armstrong
Defendant:
Carolyn Golson and Stephanie Atchison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
