Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Helms et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Tony Helms, Mike McCorment, James Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Smith (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00575
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Henderson
Defendant:
Tyrone Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Steele et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Deon Steele, LeAndria Russaw, Jennifer McCovery and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01042
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Charles Graddick and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Henderson, Harold Gilmore, Ernest F. Platt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Gwathney et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00381
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Clifford Walker and Leigh Gwathney
Plaintiff:
Kendall Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00339
Defendant:
Captain Tuck, Officer Templin, Lieutenant Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Brunson et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00310
Defendant:
Tony Helms, Geneva County Jail, Macon County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Brunson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2020cv00283
Defendant:
Officer Danny, Officer Harris, Lee Bo and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Houston County et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00997
Defendant:
J. Trawick, Houston County Commissioners, Judge Derrick and others
Plaintiff:
Zamaine Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
