Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Sigers v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Emmett Sigers
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins, Covington County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Chester L. Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neal v. Brazier et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Ms. Phillips and James Brazier
Plaintiff:
Marlow Jerome Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billingsley v. Parker et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00862
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Neal Billingsley
Defendant:
Robert Parker, Nygeon C. Thomas, Mary Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Ventress Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Neal
Defendant:
Ventress Correctional Facility, Karla Jones and CO I Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billingsley v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00748
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Neal Billingsley
Defendant:
D. Daniels, Alabama Department of Corrections, Phyllis Billups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Rahming et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00470
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Rahming , V. Lockhart , Desiree Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 1:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
Roderick Dewayne Neal
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Neal v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Dion Mario Neal
Defendant:
Lt. Calloway, Officer Wilson, Officer Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Neal (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
David McDonald
Defendant:
Officer Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.