Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Stokes v. M&T Bank et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
M&T Bank and Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Morrissey v. Barrett et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
Deckrice L. Morrissey
Defendant:
Bobby Barrett and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garrison v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00846
Plaintiff:
Tammy R. Garrison
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, William Miller, Tommy Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Gams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00705
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
David Gams, Nurse Chappel, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dillard et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Arnetra Smith
Defendant:
Cynthia Dillard, Donald Campbell, Bill Wynne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Barrett et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
LaToria D. Jordan
Defendant:
Bobby Barrett and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McPherson v. Barrett, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Karen McPherson
Defendant:
Bobby Barrett and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brewer v. Administration of Tutwiler A.D.O.C. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Tammy Brewer
Defendant:
Administration of Tutwiler A.D.O.C., Bobby Barrett, Gwendolyn Terrance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Woods et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Bobby Barrett
Defendant:
Micheal Woods and Matt Pete
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. Albright et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Allison Sharette Britt
Defendant:
Frank Albright , Bobby Barrett and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.