Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Petersen v. Drew (INMATE 3)
as 2:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
Allan A. Petersen
Defendant:
Darlene A. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Lappin et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2007cv01117
Plaintiff:
Roy Williams
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and D. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dumonde v. Cavers et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv01079
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lafitte Dumonde
Defendant:
Kathy Cavers, Darlene Drew, Ricky Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Petersen v. Drew (INMATE3)
as 2:2007cv00785
Plaintiff:
Allan A. Petersen
Defendant:
Darlene Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cater v. Drew (INMATE3)
as 2:2007cv00739
Plaintiff:
James Otis Cater
Defendant:
Darlene Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baker v. Drew (INMATE 3)
as 2:2007cv00622
Plaintiff:
William E. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Darlene Drew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fortson v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLC et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00576
Plaintiff:
Carey A. Fortson, Sr.
Defendant:
Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, Con Agra Foods, LLC, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Drew (INMATE 3)
as 2:2007cv00255
Plaintiff:
Lavon Heath
Defendant:
Darlene A. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Drew et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2007cv00227
Plaintiff:
Albert Hernandez
Defendant:
Darlene Drew, G. Kendall Sharp and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dumonde v. Drew et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00188
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lafitte Dumonde
Defendant:
D. Drew, Paul D. Clement and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
