Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Golomb v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al.
as 2:2013cv00659
Plaintiff: Phillip N. Golomb
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00525
Plaintiff: Jamilah Miller
Defendant: Organon USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sharp v. Invacare Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00212
Plaintiff: Steven D. Sharp
Defendant: Invacare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huffman v. Organon USA, Inc., et al
as 3:2012cv00747
Defendant: Organon USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc., Merck & Co, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Keisha Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., et al
as 2:2011cv00346
Plaintiff: Mary Jo Barnes
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Michael Beck , Julie Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharpe v. United States of America (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00489
Plaintiff: Tony Lewis Sharpe
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
King v. Oliver et al (INMATE1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01072
Plaintiff: Yuself King
Defendant: Terrell Oliver, C.O. I Bennett, C.O. I Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Drew et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2007cv00227
Plaintiff: Albert Hernandez
Defendant: Darlene Drew, G. Kendall Sharp and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?