Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Forniss et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2014cv01228
Plaintiff:
Jerome Calhoun
Defendant:
Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams, et al. v. Ambassador Personnel, Inc., et al. (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2014cv00900
Plaintiff:
Anthony Adams , Billy Andrews , Quincy Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Ambassador Personnel, Inc. , Ambassador Personnel of Alabama, Inc. and Guyoung Tech USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Broadhead v. Miree et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00677
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Angela Miree, J. Baldwin, Deaundre Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Miree, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00641
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Angela Miree, J. Baldwin, T. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Olds et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00367
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Centavriad Olds, Brian Robinson, Sterlinc Steed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00341
Plaintiff:
Leander Calhoun
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, Phyllis Billups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00306
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stephen West
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Calhoun County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Calhoun v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00288
Plaintiff:
Orlando Calhoun
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Calhoun v. Stamper et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00632
Plaintiff:
Frederick Tyrone Calhoun
Defendant:
Dennis Stamper and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
