Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Hill v. Alabama D.O.C. et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2010cv00544
Plaintiff:
Bobby Akles Hill
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Troy King and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Black v. Thomas et al (INMATE1)
as 3:2009cv01043
Plaintiff:
Lorinza Black
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, State of Alabama and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. Thomas et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv01031
Plaintiff:
Russell Ford
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Truss v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00894
Plaintiff:
Learonardo Truss
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Charles McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Wilson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00859
Plaintiff:
Junior Russell
Defendant:
James Wilson, Timothy May, Kendrick Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parish v. Thomas et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00623
Plaintiff:
Robert Dowe Parish
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Patricia Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Truss v. Thomas et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00120
Plaintiff:
Learonardo Truss
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00713
Plaintiff:
Willie Thomas Carter
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, Doctor Peasant, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Simon v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00562
Plaintiff:
Franklin Delano Simon, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Nurse Guise and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mahone v. Giles et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2007cv01027
Plaintiff:
Dean Eric Mahone
Defendant:
Sandra Giles, Willie Thomas and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
