Cases 61 - 70 of 141
Hill v. Logan et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Reginald Logan, Justin Stanley, Heath Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Morris et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00739
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Sgt. Morris, Donald Valenza, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1) (LEAD)
as 1:2021cv00740
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, James Brazier and Officer Morris
Consolidated Defendant:
Sharon King and Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 1)(LEAD CASE)
as 1:2021cv00705
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Brazier, Kelita Moore, Donald J. Valenza and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Officer Isler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00761
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, Kelita Moore and James Brazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00708
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Brazier, Donald J. Valenza and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2021cv00689
Plaintiff:
Daryus D. Sullivan
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Sgt. Schroeder, Lt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Moore et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Kelita Moore and Officer Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Wyatt et al (INMATE 1)(LEAD CASE)
as 1:2021cv00671
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Wyatt and James Brazier
Consolidated Defendant:
Spencer Downs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00704
Plaintiff:
Daryus S. Sullivan and Daryus D. Sullivan
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Sgt. Schroeder, Heath Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
