Cases 61 - 70 of 295
Williams v. Moore et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Williams
Defendant:
Sgt. Moore, Sgt. Ray, Lt. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, CRPN Aplinlin, Jennifer McCovery and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Short et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Judge Short, Captain Huggins, Sherrif Turman and others
Plaintiff:
William T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. Franklin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv01071
Defendant:
Captain Tuck, Bill Franklin, Sgt. Heard and others
Plaintiff:
Alqurin Lavon Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Myles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01072
Defendant:
Warden Myles, Lt. Waverly, P. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dees and Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Topping et al v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00941
Defendant:
Mary Cooks, Cheryl Price, Ms. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Holliman and Joseph Scott Topping
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00926
Defendant:
Montgomery County Detention Facility, Montgomery County Commissioner, Derrick Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher DeWayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. Jones et al (INMATE 1) (MEMBER)
as 2:2020cv00850
Defendant:
Captain Carter, Waylon Cousins, C. S. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Crow et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00793
Defendant:
Lt. McCovery, John Doe, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Ladae Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. Jones et al (INMATE 2) (LEAD)
as 2:2020cv00747
Defendant:
Captain Carter, Lt. Cousins, C. S. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
