Cases 1 - 10 of 670
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Mitchell et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Demericon Alex Williams
Defendant:
Phillip Mitchell and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Russell v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Tallapoosa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Watson v. Givens et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Julian Brett Watson
Defendant:
Adrienne Givens and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Alabama v. Hammond
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
Hammond Ketavious Javon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
