Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Kerrick v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Bernard Randal Kerrick
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Cohen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Sanchez
Defendant:
Alan Cohen, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hyde v. The State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Tristan Michael Hyde
Defendant:
The County of Lee, Alabama, Jay Jones, Lee County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aldissi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01074
Plaintiff:
Matt Aldissi and Mahmoud Aldissi
Defendant:
Hugh Hurwitz, Alan Cohen, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nekvasil v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00274
Plaintiff:
James R. Nekvasil, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00280
Plaintiff:
Aundra Mason
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorta-Hernandez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Saul Dorta-Hernandez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda-Lizardi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
Anthony Miranda-Lizardi
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
Gregory Milton
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
Javier Rodriguez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
