Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Boe et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner:
Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. $2,202.00 In United States Currency et al
as 2:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$2,202.00 In United States Currency, $14,001.00 In United States Currency, A 1964 Chevrolet Impala, VIN: 41767S185721, with all appurtenance and attachments thereon and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $389,820.00 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2020cv01048
Defendant:
4,550.00 in United States Currency, $389,820.00 in United States Currency, 1972 Chevrolet Chevelle SS 396, VIN: 1D37H2R582820, with all appurtenances and attachments thereon and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Ruby Barton
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $389,820.00 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2016cv00985
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$389,820.00 in United States Currency , $15,780.00 in United States Currency , $4,550.00 in United States Currency and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Seventy One Thousand Three Hundred Seventeen Dollars and Seventy-Six Cents ($71,317.76) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2011cv00469
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Seventy One Thousand Three Hundred Seventeen Dollars and Seventy-Six Cents ($71,317.76) in United States Currency, A Cartier Watch, 165 Prepaid Access Cards and others
Claimant:
Rhashema Shantae Deramus
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
