Cases 131 - 140 of 10,769
Mosley v. Baker et al
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Mosley
Defendant:
Baker and Dent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harbour v. Cryer et al
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Trenece L Harbour
Defendant:
John Cryer, Marshall Woodward, Bud Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hughes v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv08001
Petitioner:
Gregory Wade Hughes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stone v. Hamm et al
as 6:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
James L Stone
Defendant:
John Hamm and Scotty Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Medical Staff at Hamilton Aged & Infirmed (INMATE 4)
as 6:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
Elbert Ballard
Defendant:
Medical Staff at Hamilton Aged & Infirmed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Connie Monique Moore
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobson v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
David Otto Jacobson
Respondent:
Jonathan W Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salas v. Warden Neely
as 7:2023cv01768
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Hernandez Salas
Respondent:
Warden Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobson v. O'BRYANT et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
WILLIAM O'BRYANT, Deputy Lusk, Deputy Chief Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Limestone Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 3)
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gene Walker
Defendant:
Limestone Correctional Facility, Deborah Toney and Officer Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
