Cases 61 - 70 of 167
Keister v. Bell et al
as 7:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Rodney Keister
Defendant:
Stuart Bell , John Hooks and Mitchell Odom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couram v. UAB Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv02055
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carnell Couram
Defendant:
UAB Police Department, Birmingham Police Department, Birmingham City Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
White et al v. Huntsville City Schools Board of Education
as 5:2016cv01771
Plaintiff:
John K. White , Karen E. White , Shawn Anderson and others
Defendant:
Huntsville City Schools Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Chance v. Thomason et al
as 1:2016cv01751
Plaintiff:
Margaret A Chance
Defendant:
John C Thomason, Thomas Van Parker, Calhoun County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dawson v. Jackson et al
as 2:2016cv01738
Plaintiff:
John Arthur Dawson
Defendant:
Byron Jackson , Brad Watson and Leeds, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Maupin
as 2:2016cv01405
Plaintiff:
Arthur Thomas
Defendant:
John E. Maupin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barr v. Jefferson County Barber Commision, The et al
as 2:2016cv01340
Plaintiff:
Geta Barr
Defendant:
Jefferson County Barber Commision, The, Florence Johnson, Trina Paulding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barber v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2016cv01321
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, John Koskinen, Rebecca Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Gibson
as 2:2016cv01258
Plaintiff:
John H Peters
Defendant:
Sandra Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2016cv01247
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Maurice Garrett, Paul Edward Trull, Jr, Kimberly Dawn Trull and others
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, John Koskinen, Rebecca Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
