Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carr v. Davis et al
as 6:2023cv00744
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Carr
Respondent:
Gwendolyn Davis, Steve Marshall and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lanford v. Tipton et al (INMATE 3)
as 5:2020cv01949
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, State of Alabama, Scott Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Glenn Lanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Archilla et al v. Witte et al
as 4:2020cv00596
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Garcia Rivera, Karim Tahir Golding, Landry Emily Mbendeke and others
Respondent:
Matthew T Albence, Dianne Witte, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frazier v. State of Alabama
as 2:2017cv01337
Petitioner:
Roger Dale Frazier
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers v. State of Alabama (The) et al
as 5:2015cv00704
Petitioner:
Keith A. Rogers
Respondent:
State of Alabama (The) and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McFarlin v. Robertson et al
as 4:2014cv01623
Petitioner:
Torien Terez McFarlin
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Roger Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers v. Wise et al
as 4:2008cv00509
Petitioner:
Tommy James Rogers
Respondent:
David J Wise and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers v. State of Alabama
as 4:2007cv01655
Petitioner:
Paul Andrew Rogers
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Drew
as 2:2007cv00610
Petitioner:
Kenneth L. Rogers
Respondent:
D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCoy v. Cummings et al
as 2:2007cv00087
Petitioner:
Roger McCoy
Respondent:
Cummings, Cummings, Attorney General of the State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
