Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund and others
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, William R Adair, T Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Officer Finley et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Officer Finley, Officer Moise, Officer Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Carr
as 2:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
Jimita Rachel Dixon
Defendant:
Danny Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. DiStephano et al
as 3:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Mark Davis
Defendant:
James DiStephano, Christina Keeton and Danny Wesson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ladinsky et al v. Ivey et al
as 5:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
Morissa J Ladinsky, Hussein D Abdul-Latif, Robert Roe and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Jill H Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00890
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grocholski v. Ingle et al
as 6:2017cv02111
Plaintiff:
Kelli Grocholski
Defendant:
Rodney Ingle, Danny Jenkins, Michael Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jelks v. McDonald et al
as 2:2016cv01639
Plaintiff:
Danny O'Neal Jelks
Defendant:
Robert McDonald, Phyllis Curtis, Michael E Kilcoyne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
