Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Tragas v. Garrett et al
as 7:2022cv00899
Petitioner:
Joanne Tragas
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Neely, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frantzen v. Federal Correctional Institution Aliceville et al
as 7:2021cv00722
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution Aliceville, Nurse Eli, Sharon Stegall Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Holly Leanne Frantzen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foard v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00564
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Joe Foard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Nash et al
as 2:2021cv00518
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Cheron Y Nash
Petitioner:
Dante Antwan Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lindsey v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Hoover City Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv00098
Plaintiff:
Darron McCall
Defendant:
Federal Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Hoover City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nasiruddin v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 1:2021cv00091
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Mujahid Nasiruddin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuire-Mollica v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 7:2020cv01768
Defendant:
Chad Garrett, Medley, Shoulders and others
Plaintiff:
Terri McGuire-Mollica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01717
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Ms Shoulders, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Shareka Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bridges v. Warden et al
as 7:2020cv01646
Plaintiff:
Comulus L Bridges
Defendant:
Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Governor of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
