Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Nevers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00575
Defendant:
Patrica Bradley, The Medical and Health Staff, Camp Administrator Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Shawanda Nevers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevers v. Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2020cv00525
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Camp Administrator Jenkins
Petitioner:
Shawanda Nevers
Defendant:
Patrica Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benn v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2019cv01635
Defendant:
Gary, Lt. Jenkins, Jeffery Best and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Labron Benn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2019cv01486
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Mohammad Jenkins
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jones, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Miree et al
as 2:2019cv00432
Defendant:
Warden III Gordy, CO T. Grace, LPN Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Gordy et al
as 2:2018cv01788
Defendant:
Aaron Mechalske, Warden Gordy, M Wheat and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al
as 7:2018cv00526
Plaintiff:
Joseph Earl Jenkins , Jr
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Jail, Sergeant Sanders, Shelia Little and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2017cv02001
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster
Defendant:
Jenkins, Young, Eddie Watts and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Roy et al
as 2:2017cv01952
Plaintiff:
Stanley Brent Chatman
Defendant:
Kennedy D Roy and Mohammad Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 2:2017cv01951
Petitioner:
Antwon D Jenkins
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
