Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,776
Hawthorne v. Kizer et al
as 5:2024cv00592
Plaintiff: Arice Hawthorne
Defendant: Debra Kizer, Blake Dean, Donna Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. King
as 2:2024cv00581
Plaintiff: Jessica Kelly
Defendant: Matthew King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Petitioner: Gavin Howard
Respondent: Jordan Powell and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff: Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant: Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff: Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant: Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner: Antonio Dentray Battle
Respondent: Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brunson v. Green et al
as 5:2024cv00541
Plaintiff: Albert Brunson
Defendant: Green, Howell and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBrahl-Daniels v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00519
Petitioner: Leatrice Malika DeBrahl-Daniels
Defendant: Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Howard v. Powell
as 7:2024cv00510
Petitioner: Gavin Howard
Respondent: Jordan Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horton v. Richerson et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff: Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant: Kelly Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?