Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Douglas v. Limestone Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lamont Douglas
Defendant:
Limestone Correctional Facility, Amber Johnson and Roderick Gadsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2020cv01977
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Alabama Department of Pardons and Paroles, Steve Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minniefield v. Gordy et al
as 2:2019cv00218
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Finest Douglas Minniefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kyttle v. Smart et al
as 2:2018cv02052
Defendant:
David Pirritano, Kenneth L. Joiner, Alice K. Matin and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Kyttle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Cullman County Detention Center
as 5:2018cv01805
Plaintiff:
Shawn Douglas Alexander Berryhill
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv02194
Plaintiff:
George Blackmon, Jr
Defendant:
Mick Hale, Brandon Kent Falls, A C Roper and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Walker et al
as 2:2017cv01256
Plaintiff:
Christopher Douglas
Defendant:
Clint Walker, Akeem Edmonds, Wallace Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGregor v. Thomas et al
as 4:2017cv00593
Plaintiff:
Michael McGregor
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Jefferson Dunn, Grantt Culliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Myers et al
as 5:2016cv02057
Petitioner:
Carl Douglas White
Respondent:
Walter Myers and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fancher v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv01815
Petitioner:
Douglas Fancher
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Mike Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
