Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Miller v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01470
Petitioner:
Shannon Miller
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Renney v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen Renney
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Commissioner John Hamm, Commissioner Jeff Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Montgomery
as 7:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Marcus F Miller
Defendant:
Chedonna Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller, III v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00552
Petitioner:
Alonzo Miller, III
Respondent:
Steve Marshall and Warden III Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dees v. Lamar et al
as 2:2020cv01326
Defendant:
Richardson, O Walker, Tomlin and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archilla et al v. Witte et al
as 4:2020cv00596
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Garcia Rivera, Karim Tahir Golding, Landry Emily Mbendeke and others
Respondent:
Matthew T Albence, Dianne Witte, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. White et al
as 7:2018cv01408
Defendant:
Sgt. N. White and Bibb County Prison
Plaintiff:
James Ray Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Oxford Police Department et al
as 5:2018cv00786
Plaintiff:
Gregory Markelle Hubbard
Defendant:
Oxford Police Department, John L. Friend, Andrew S. Miller and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. State of Alabama
as 2:2017cv01329
Petitioner:
Alonzo Miller
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Dunn et al
as 4:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Miller
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Eric Evans, Angelia Gordy and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
