Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Caswell v. Horton et al
as 4:2023cv01380
Defendant:
Cassi R Peek, Kristen Ward, Sheriff Jonathon Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Caswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. Madison County Alabama Circuit Court et al
as 5:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Charles Randolph Clemons
Defendant:
Madison County Alabama Circuit Court and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cargill v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv01186
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Y. Cargill
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Davenport et al
as 2:2018cv01448
Defendant:
Clevon Randolph and Carter Davenport
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Davenport et al
as 2:2018cv00834
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Houston
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Clevon Randolph and Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Randolph County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2016cv01717
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Garrett, Jr
Defendant:
Randolph County Sheriff Department, Krista Traylor and Donnie Strain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBee v. Estes
as 5:2015cv00424
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBee v. Daniels et al
as 5:2014cv02308
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Daniels and Limestone Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBee v. A.D.O.C. Classification et al
as 5:2014cv01221
Petitioner:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Respondent:
A.D.O.C. Classification, Central Records Office and Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McBee v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv01218
Petitioner:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Respondent:
Estes and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
