Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant:
Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caswell v. Horton et al
as 4:2023cv01380
Defendant:
Cassi R Peek, Kristen Ward, Sheriff Jonathon Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Caswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. D.O.C. State of Alabama
as 2:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Ernest Rogers
Defendant:
D.O.C. State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Alcaliph Woodard
Defendant:
Domingo Gonzales, Terrance Davis, Chris Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Davis et al
as 6:2023cv00744
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Carr
Respondent:
Gwendolyn Davis, Steve Marshall and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodard v. Paul et al
as 1:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Alcaliph Woodard
Defendant:
Jason Paul, Justin Cooper, Michael L Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Ms. Cooper et al
as 5:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Martel Robinson
Defendant:
Ms. Cooper, K Cash, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stovall v. Gwathney et al
as 5:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Stovall
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Darryl Littleton, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01450
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Ernest Rogers
Defendant:
Alabama, State of and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Kern et al
as 6:2021cv00779
Defendant:
Donald Kern, Grace, Quality Health Care and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
