Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Cases 171 - 180 of 53,793
Levitt v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2024cv00285
Plaintiff: Ronald Levitt
Defendant: U.S. Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Zelkowski v. Thomas
as 7:2024cv00300
Plaintiff: Jeremy Zelkowski
Defendant: Casedy Ann Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rusk et al v. City of Birmingham, Alabama
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff: Daniel Rusk and Mary Frances Rusk
Defendant: City of Birmingham, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. Metro PCS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff: Jamie Christopher May
Defendant: Metro PCS, AT&T Corp, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pascual v. Martinez et al
as 4:2024cv00513
Plaintiff: Angelica Pascual
Defendant: Cesar G Martinez and Crane Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Giles v. Spring Oaks Capital LLC
as 2:2024cv00514
Plaintiff: Krashunda Giles
Defendant: Spring Oaks Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Posey et al v. Hammer
as 2:2024cv00515
Plaintiff: Veronica A Posey and Zhari A Posey
Defendant: Harvey B Hammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff: Jamie Christopher May
Defendant: TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johns et al v. Hatch et al
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff: Johnny Johns and Delyum Johns
Defendant: James Donald Hatch and Presbyterian Church in America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?