Cases 21 - 30 of 130
Ayers v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00478
Defendant:
Gaines, Watts, Tunstall and others
Plaintiff:
Jaunes Ayers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Averett v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv00406
Plaintiff:
Corry Averett
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Betty Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Steward Shaw, Officer A. Johnson, Officer Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. The Country Rock Cabaret LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00585
Defendant:
The Country Rock Cabaret LLC an Alabama Limited Liability Company doing business as Uncle Buck's Boobie Bungalow and Charles Westlund, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Malika Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv01815
Plaintiff:
Antwon D Jenkins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01717
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Ms Shoulders, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Shareka Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Tony et al
as 7:2020cv01283
Defendant:
Officer Renolds, Alabama Department of Corrections, Warden Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Noble Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dunn et al
as 5:2020cv01325
Plaintiff:
Jack Jones
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Leon Bouldin and Muhammed Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01141
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Ms. Bell and others
Petitioner:
Tanya L. English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crinel v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01099
Respondent:
Mr. Lopez, Jenkins, Ms. Haywood and others
Petitioner:
Lisa A Crinel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
