Cases 21 - 30 of 355
Anderson v. Lt. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Anderson
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Sgt. Cottles, C.O. Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Marshall County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv01599
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Allen
Defendant:
Marshall County Jail, Warden Addam Riddle, Assistant Warden Bremer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Givens et al
as 2:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Ocie Lee Lynch
Defendant:
Warden G. Givens, Warden Vencini Smith and Warden Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reagan v. Warden Kimberly Neely
as 7:2023cv01588
Petitioner:
Casondra Reagan
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tzoy v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv01549
Petitioner:
Eluvina Car Tzoy
Respondent:
Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VanPelt v. Warden
as 7:2023cv01550
Petitioner:
Hunter VanPelt
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hoff v. Bright et al
as 5:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Jon Coleman Hoff
Defendant:
Lt. Bright, Warden William Streeter, Capt. Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLeod v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv01554
Plaintiff:
Michael D McLeod
Defendant:
Michael Jones, Shannon Caldwell, Asst Warden Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01757
Petitioner:
Richard L Wilson
Respondent:
Warden Williams and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Marshall County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv01635
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Allen
Defendant:
Marshall County Jail, Warden Addam Riddle, Bremer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
