Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Riley v. Shine
as 5:2015cv00587
Plaintiff:
Maurice W. Riley, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel J. Shine, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley v. Thompson CAT et al
as 5:2014cv02362
Plaintiff:
Maurice W Riley, Jr
Defendant:
Thompson CAT , American Truck Protection and North Florida Truck Parts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riley v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2014cv01330
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Riley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Riley v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2014cv01112
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Riley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Morris et al v. Aschenbrenner Trucking Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00485
Plaintiff:
Wardell Morris and June Cooper Morris
Defendant:
Aschenbrenner Trucking Inc. and Ray Dean Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sides v. Riley et al
as 5:2013cv01815
Petitioner:
Lynda Alma Sides
Respondent:
Jack C Riley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Higginbotham v. Judicial Correction Services Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00740
Plaintiff:
Barry C Higginbotham
Defendant:
Judicial Correction Services Inc, Jeff Riley, Darnell Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Petitioner:
James Edward Spencer
Respondent:
Robert Bentley, Bob Riley, Don Siegelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rounsavall et al v. Ametek, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv02785
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Rounsavall and Opal Rounsavall
Defendant:
Ametek, Inc., BASF Catalyst LLC , Champlain Cable Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv02491
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
Clyde E Jones, Brandon K Falls, Anne Marie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
