Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Ledcke v. Rathman et al
as 1:2015cv02137
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Ledcke
Defendant:
John T Rathman, Becky Clay, Walter Vereen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
as 7:2015cv01401
Plaintiff:
Brad Walker
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanders et al v. Schneider National Carriers Inc et al
as 6:2014cv02234
Plaintiff:
Rebecca J Sanders and Douglas Wayne Sanders
Defendant:
Schneider National Carriers Inc and Brad M Bosanec
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Little v. Walker County Board of Education et al
as 6:2013cv01539
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Little
Defendant:
Walker County Board of Education , Brad Ingle , Brenda Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ward v. The Attorney General of the State of Alabama et al
as 5:2012cv03418
Petitioner:
Carl Brad Ward
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PNC Bank, National Association v. Adept Technologies LLC et al
as 5:2012cv02652
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Adept Technologies LLC, Chad W Fielder and Brad H Fielder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
