Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Cases 41 - 50 of 133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00727
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00248
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2018cv00005
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Coleman v. Xtreme Concepts LLC
as 2:2017cv02005
Plaintiff: Chester Coleman
Defendant: Xtreme Concepts LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01255
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JSC Gazprom Teploenergo v. Mid-America Engine Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00199
Plaintiff: JSC Gazprom Teploenergo
Defendant: Mid-America Engine Inc and Keith M Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Coleman v. Housing Authority of the Birmingham District et al
as 2:2016mc01528
Plaintiff: Ranishia R Coleman
Defendant: Housing Authority of the Birmingham District and OCIE Medical Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hunter et al v. Steel et al
as 2:2016cv00402
Plaintiff: Lashawn Hunter , Dorothy Coleman and Jayla Hunter
Defendant: Antonio Devon Steel and Warren Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00108
Plaintiff: Mark Coleman
Defendant: Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc and United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Coleman v. Thomas et al
as 1:2016cv00008
Petitioner: Shaeffer Marquis Coleman
Respondent: Warden Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?