Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Berry et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02054
Plaintiff:
Susan Berry , Jackie Brewster , Alex Brown and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC , Mueller Water Products Inc and USP Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oden v. Price et al
as 2:2015cv01227
Plaintiff:
Rodney Oden
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Cedric Specks, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tobin v. Murphy et al
as 7:2015cv01102
Plaintiff:
Brent Foster Tobin
Defendant:
Chris Murphy, Adam Pate and Johnathan Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv00803
Plaintiff:
Roy Murphy Rutledge
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Kim Thomas, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
Jeremy L. Murphy
Defendant:
Community Health Systems Inc and Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. Prince Telecom LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
Brandon W Murphy
Defendant:
Prince Telecom LLC, Dycom Industries Inc, Bill Valentino and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Tanner et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv02407
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Tanner and Marita Murphy
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc, Highland Industries Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Murphy v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2014cv02149
Plaintiff:
Marty K Murphy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vines v. McGrady et al
as 1:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
Robin Vines
Defendant:
Layton McGrady, Murphy, Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
