Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shipp v. Myers et al
as 5:2015cv00669
Petitioner:
Kenneth C. Shipp
Respondent:
Walter Myers and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arekelian et al v. Hussain et al
as 1:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jyll Underhill Arekelian , David Myers and Aynsley Myers
Defendant:
Terri Taylor Easterbrooks Hussain , Beverly Sue Adams and Khuram Hussain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belser v. Myers et al
as 2:2015cv00071
Petitioner:
Johnnie Belser
Respondent:
Walter Myers and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Only One Inc, The et al v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv02166
Plaintiff:
Only One Inc, The , Homewood Auto Body Specialists Inc , McDaniel Enterprises Inc and others
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company , State Farm Fire and Casualty Company , Allstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Perkins v. Thomas et al
as 7:2014cv01814
Petitioner:
Roy E Perkins
Respondent:
Kim Thomas and Walter Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benton v. Myers et al
as 2:2014cv01692
Petitioner:
Corey Eugene Benton
Respondent:
Walter Myers and Alabama Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Myers v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 6:2014cv01533
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Myers
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Jerry Lovelace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00806
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Myers v. Blakely
as 5:2013cv02110
Plaintiff:
Bryan J Myers
Defendant:
Mike Blakely and Vanessa Rich
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
