Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, McCall and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bearry v. Jones et al
as 2:2014cv00496
Petitioner:
Timothy Lindsey Bearry
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McWhorter v. Thomas et al
as 4:2013cv02150
Petitioner:
Casey A. McWhorter
Respondent:
Kim T Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robles v. Gordy et al
as 1:2013cv02125
Petitioner:
Heriberto Arevalo Robles
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Defendant:
Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Forniss et al
as 1:2013cv01965
Petitioner:
Stephen R Harris
Respondent:
Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crews-Bey v Price et al
as 2:2013cv01816
Plaintiff:
Kamiles Crews-Bey
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Brian Eskelfnin, Thomas Woodfin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burr v. Estes et al
as 7:2013cv01579
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Burr
Respondent:
DeWayne Estes and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marbury v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2013cv01363
Petitioner:
Anthony L Marbury
Respondent:
State of Alabama, Christopher Gordy and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Sconyeva et al
as 2:2013cv01261
Petitioner:
Daniel Lamar Jones
Respondent:
Kenneth Sconyeva and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rief v. California, The State of et al
as 2:2013cv00793
Petitioner:
Tammy Rief
Respondent:
California, The State of, Kamala Harris, Luther Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
