Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Hoskin v. Roy, et al.
as 4:2012cv02067
Plaintiff:
Torreco Hoskin
Defendant:
Kennedy Roy, McDonald and Bolling
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carolina Casualty Insurance Company v. Law Offices of Robert M Pears PC et al
as 2:2012cv01828
Plaintiff:
Carolina Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Law Offices of Robert M Pears PC, Dana Suggs , Charles McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald et al v. Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company
as 6:2011cv03656
Plaintiff:
Jeffery McDonald and Christy L McDonald
Defendant:
Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDonald et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02946
Plaintiff:
Camrin J McDonald , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corp, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadhead v. Coatey et al
as 2:2011cv01439
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
S Coatney, Deaundra Johnson, Yambip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00392
Plaintiff:
Robert McDonald , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010mc01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McDonald et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2010cv02200
Plaintiff:
Patrick M McDonald and Barbara A McDonald
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. Sutton et al
as 2:2010cv01818
Plaintiff:
Jamal Patterson
Defendant:
Sutton, Gary, McDonald and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
