Cases 71 - 80 of 100
Lee v. Webb et al
as 2:2011cv00562
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenny Lee
Defendant:
Webb, Rogers, Curry and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Shelby County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen Ray
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Office, Chris Curry and Shelby County Jail Medical Staff
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv02191
Plaintiff:
Antonio Devon Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Riley et al
as 7:2010cv02067
Plaintiff:
William Johnson , Annie Pearl Leftwich , Bobbie Morgan and others
Defendant:
Bob Riley and John M Tyson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Edwards v. Hall et al
as 7:2010cv02046
Plaintiff:
William Mack Edwards
Defendant:
Todd Hall, Johnny Stephenson, David Lee Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2010cv01900
Plaintiff:
Doris Stone Curry
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Curry v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2010cv01289
Plaintiff:
Zachary Walter Curry
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shuler et al v. Swatek et al
as 2:2010cv01215
Plaintiff:
Roger Shuler and Carol Shuler
Defendant:
William E Swatek, Mike McGarity, Alabama State Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odegbile v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2010cv00055
Plaintiff:
Damilola Odegbile
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail and Chris Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
