Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Carstarphen v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen and Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Sr.
Defendant:
Kennth Gillespie, Mathew Simpson, Robert H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hill v. Steele et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Labarron Dewayne Hall and LaBarron Dewayne Hill
Defendant:
William H. Steele, S. Mitcell McRae, John Malcolm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Besselaar v. Alabama Board of Pardon & Parole
as 1:2021cv00038
Plaintiff:
Tracy H. Besselaar
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardon & Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucy v. Thames et al
as 1:2020cv00450
Defendant:
Frank Kruse, Gretchen Elaine Walker, Fernandez, Crane & Comb Law Firm and others
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruise v. Brooks
as 1:2019cv00256
Defendant:
Benjamin H. Brooks, III and State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Harold David Cruise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drinkard v. Onderdonk et al
as 1:2018cv00450
Defendant:
Ms. Wise, Sgt. Turner, Corporal D. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Drinkard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riggs v. Brooks et al
as 1:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Jessie Riggs
Defendant:
Ben H. Brooks , Patrick Doggett, Bryan Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towles v. Mobile Co Circuit Court et al
as 1:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
Rolland Sean Towles
Defendant:
Mobile Co Circuit Court, District Atty Office, DART Restitution Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Onderdonk et al
as 1:2016cv00492
Plaintiff:
Aven H. Cotton
Defendant:
Michael Onderdonk, Robert Keahey, Sr., Richard Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Smith
as 1:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Damon Elijah Gardner
Defendant:
Robert H. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
