Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Wilson et al v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00354
Defendant:
Elizabeth Watford, Sheree Johnson, Catrinna Long Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Wilson and Lorenzo M. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Attia v. Pascagoula Police, et al
as 1:2023cv00342
Defendant:
Steve Harvard, Randy Neil, Pascagoula Police and others
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Attia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe v. Spring Hill College et al
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Spring Hill College, Craig McVey, William Robert Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Thomas v. Angle et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Breannia Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. John W. Angle and City of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Attia v. Cannon Ford et al
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Attia
Defendant:
Cannon Ford, Randy Niel, David Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Attia v. Cannon Ford et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Attia
Defendant:
Cannon Ford, David Jackson, Chad Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Gaddis et al v. Hamm et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Doe
as 1:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Mikal Shanton Watson
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullen v. Butler et al
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Willie A Sullen
Defendant:
Charles R. Butler, David Barnett, Chris Galanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
