Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Jones v. Albright et al
as 1:2009cv00398
Petitioner:
Beverly Jo Jones
Respondent:
Frank Albright and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Albright et al
as 1:2009cv00351
Petitioner:
Charlain M. Allen
Respondent:
Frank Albright and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Culliver et al
as 1:2009cv00275
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Hayes
Defendant:
Grant Culliver, Watson Bishop, David Craft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Back v. Ferrell et al
as 1:2008cv00347
Plaintiff:
Frank Lee Back
Defendant:
Jerry Ferrell and Richard Hetrick
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Marengo County Jail et al
as 2:2007cv00662
Plaintiff:
Brook Joel Davis
Defendant:
Marengo County Jail, Otis Jackson and Frank Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Back v. Kittrell et al
as 1:2007cv00638
Plaintiff:
Frank Lee Back
Defendant:
Braxton L. Kittrell, Donald E. Brutkiewicz, Chris Galonas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Patterson et al
as 1:2007cv00504
Plaintiff:
Sharone Goodwin
Defendant:
Tony Patterson, Lanetta Banks, Darell Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Williams et al
as 1:2007cv00405
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jermaine Brown
Defendant:
Jeffrey Williams and Frank Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Marengo County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2007cv00461
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Marengo County Sheriff Department, Derrick Carter, Kenneth Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall et al v. Riley et al
as 1:2007cv00240
Petitioner:
Frank Marshall
Respondent:
Bob Riley, Arnold Holt and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
