Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Courtney M. Smith
Defendant:
David Jones, David Martinez, Leroy D. Dale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Topping et al v. Dunn et al
as 1:2020cv00606
Defendant:
Mary Cooks, Cheryl Price, Ms. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Holliman and Joseph Scott Topping
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ivey et al
as 1:2020cv00586
Respondent:
Kay Ivey, Robert Moore, Steve Marshall and others
Petitioner:
Paul Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gauthier v. Hood et al
as 1:2020cv00413
Defendant:
Deidre Prevo, Travis Paul, Felecia Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Brian S. Gauthier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. McCorquodale et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Alabama State Treasurer, Kay Ivey, Gaines G McCorquodale and others
Plaintiff:
Manson Fisher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willingham v. Director of Alabama State Personnel Department et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Mekel Jackson, Johnny M. Portis, Kayla Albritton and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eugene Willingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. Director of Mental Health
as 1:2019cv00202
Respondent:
Director of Mental Health
Petitioner:
Jesse Cooley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barrow v. Ala. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lewis Barrow
Defendant:
Ala. Dept. of Corrections, Jeff Dunn, Director of Personnel Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shakur v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv00220
Defendant:
Carl Johnson, Warden Hetzel, Deputy Warden Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Jah'Gambia Omara Shakur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
