Cases 171 - 180 of 14,452
Montgomery v. Daniels et al
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Cody P. Daniels, Sgt. John Hicks and City of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
White v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Shawn White
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cooley v. Alabama Department of Mental Health
as 1:2023cv00475
Petitioner:
Jesse Jr. Cooley
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mattson et al v. Farudi, et al
as 1:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Carla G Mattson and James E Mattson Trust
Defendant:
Rahmeen Farudi, Taruma Fruitdale, LLC, Taruma, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Coyle v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Coyle
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bradley v. USA
as 1:2023cv00470
Petitioner:
Harlan Bradley, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Orchid Underwriters Agency, LLC
as 1:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Jones
Defendant:
Orchid Underwriters Agency, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jones v. Orchid Underwriters Agency, et al
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Jones
Defendant:
Orchid Underwriters Agency, LLC, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and Orchid Underwriters Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
