Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Carstarphen v. Pipes
as 1:2023cv00004
Petitioner:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen
Respondent:
Wesley Pipes
Not Classified By Court:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosley v. Officer Young
as 1:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Romeo Donzell Mosley, Sr
Defendant:
Officer Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brazil v. TNT Railcar Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Shirley Brazil
Defendant:
TNT Railcar Services, Inc., International Paper Company and Russell Matthew Brown, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Carstarphen v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen and Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Sr.
Defendant:
Kennth Gillespie, Mathew Simpson, Robert H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
White v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
Donald D White, Sr.
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Brouillette v. Bucci et al
as 1:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
John Michael Brouillette, Sr.
Defendant:
Johana Bucci, Mobile County District Attorney's Office, Detective BaDon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Pierce v. NewRez, LLC
as 1:2021cv00068
Defendant:
NewRez, LLC doing business as Shellpoint
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Pierce, Sr
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Walker v. Peters
as 1:2020cv00531
Petitioner:
Ernest Lee Walker, Sr.
Respondent:
Kenneth Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Purifoy v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00488
Plaintiff:
NOLANE D PURIFOY, SR and Nolane D. Purifoy, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.