Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Cases 11 - 20 of 747
Williams v. Tik-Tok, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff: Wendy M. Williams
Defendant: Tik-Tok, Inc., Zhang Yiming and TIK TOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Huey v. McCall et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: William Bart Huey
Defendant: Captain McCall and Officer McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Rankins, Woods We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff: Wendy Williams
Defendant: Sylvia Rankins, Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
v. Houchens Food Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Not Yet Classified: Houchens Food Group, Inc., Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. and william e white
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in Personal Injury
Williams v. T-Mobile, USA
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff: Wendy M. Williams
Defendant: T-Mobile, USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: William Roberts and Sydnee Roberts
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Type: Contract Insurance
Williams v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner: Roderick Lee Williams
Respondent: Phillip Mitchell
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: William N. Lucy
Defendant: Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bradley v. St Luke's Episcopal School
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff: Arisha Williams Bradley
Defendant: St Luke's Episcopal School
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?