Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 225
Berger v. State Of Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff: Kenneth Berger
Defendant: State Of Alabama, FEB Bancshares, Inc., 22nd State Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama v. Berger
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff: State of Alabama
Defendant: Kenneth Douglas Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State Of Alabama et al v. Casey
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff: State Of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant: Kiley Casey
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant: Otis Nelson
Linker v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff: Linker Christopher Ryan and Christopher Ryan Linker
Defendant: State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berger v. Skully et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff: Kenneth Berger
Defendant: William E. Skully, Jr, J. Dean, Michele M. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner: Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent: State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner: George Boone, Jr.
Respondent: State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norton v. State of Alabama
as 1:2023cv00448
Petitioner: Thomas Norton
Respondent: State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Alabama v. Pugh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff: State of Alabama
Defendant: Jason Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Removal of Civil/Criminal Action from State Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?