Cases 91 - 100 of 2,274
Stewart v. Flynn et al
as 4:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dewayne Stewart
Defendant:
Sherri Flynn and Eric S Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Crawford et al
as 4:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dewayne Stewart
Defendant:
Katie Crawford, Tamera Deaver and Eric S Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finch v. Hollingsworth et al
as 4:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Elliott Finch, Jr
Defendant:
Terri Hollingsworth, Eric Higgins, Leslie Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Holdon et al
as 4:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L Scott
Defendant:
Wayne Holdon, Jr, Rick Dodd, Wayne Holding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murry v. Does
as 4:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Murry
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Pruett et al
as 4:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
William Isaac Harris
Defendant:
Pruett, Carol Crews, Hate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller v. Profiri et al
as 4:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
Romario V Waller
Defendant:
Joe Profiri, Toni Hamp, Linda Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
Ron Davis, Elisabeth Kanopsic and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Morrilton, City of et al
as 4:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
Deemarko Houston
Defendant:
Morrilton, City of and Morrilton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Pulaski County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 4:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Antoine Warner and Antoine R Warner
Defendant:
Pulaski County Prosecutor's Office and Pulaski County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
