Cases 11 - 20 of 2,937
Isham v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Matthew Isham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Owens v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Delman Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robinson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Brandy Marie Robinson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Latasha Monae Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Thews v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Christina Thews
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Demetric Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Bishop v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Regena Bishop
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ashlock v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ashlock
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Engebretson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Ruth Engebretson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Nina Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
