Cases 81 - 90 of 844
Friar v. City of West Fork, Arkansas et al
as 5:2022cv05234
Plaintiff:
Norman Friar
Defendant:
City of West Fork, Arkansas and Katelyn Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindsey et al v. Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv06113
Plaintiff:
Michael Lindsey and Marquesa Lindsey
Defendant:
Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trammell v. King et al
as 2:2022cv02164
Plaintiff:
Sarah Trammell
Defendant:
Zachary King, Jimmy Damante, Crawford County, Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flanary v. Elkin et al
as 2:2022cv02174
Defendant:
Jerry Dorney, Darrell Elkin, P.A., Ricky Denton and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Flanary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Worcester v. Riddle, et al
as 2:2022cv02142
Plaintiff:
Randal Worcester, II
Defendant:
Thell Riddle, Shannon Gregory, City of Mulberry, Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis v. Baker
as 2:2022cv02144
Plaintiff:
Luke Bradley Francis
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Rinda Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clardy v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv02148
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Clardy, Jr.
Defendant:
Police Officer Cox and Police Officer Huey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Cox et al
as 5:2022cv05151
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Allen Scott
Defendant:
Tyler Cox, Thomas Plummer, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schnekloth v. Deakins et al
as 5:2021cv05131
Plaintiff:
Clint Schnekloth
Defendant:
Patrick Deakins, Sam Duncan, Jim Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Cox et al
as 6:2022cv06086
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Allen Scott
Defendant:
Tyler Cox, Thomas Plummer, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
