Cases 11 - 20 of 390
Fenley v. Quapaw Baths, LLC
as 6:2023cv06138
Plaintiff:
Cinthia Fenley
Defendant:
Quapaw Baths, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Oliver et al v. Southwest Homes of Arkansas, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05205
Plaintiff:
William Oliver and Casey Oliver
Defendant:
Southwest Homes of Arkansas, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Oliver Builders, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cifuentes et al v. Outcomes, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv05197
Plaintiff:
Kaylee Cifuentes and Amber Carl
Defendant:
Outcomes, Inc. and Tony Posey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dafonseca et al v. Maxforce Delivery Service, LLC
as 5:2023cv05113
Plaintiff:
Elvis Dafonseca, John Dreen and David Carrillo
Defendant:
Maxforce Delivery Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Frazier v. Russell Cellular, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05093
Plaintiff:
Christian Frazier
Defendant:
Russell Cellular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Schiavo v. Phoenix Design Build, Inc.
as 6:2023cv06072
Plaintiff:
Tim Schiavo
Defendant:
Phoenix Design Build, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jenkins v. RBIS, LLC
as 4:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
Steve Jenkins
Defendant:
RBIS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gaunt v. Relentless Restaurants, LLC
as 5:2023cv05070
Plaintiff:
Michael Gaunt
Defendant:
Relentless Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Culbertson v. K-MAC Enterprises
as 5:2023cv05069
Plaintiff:
Gerard Culbertson
Defendant:
K-MAC Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Phillips v. Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc.
as 6:2023cv06055
Plaintiff:
Christopher Phillips
Defendant:
Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
