Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Cases 121 - 130 of 1,750
Mitchell v. Harwell et al
as 1:2023cv01040
Plaintiff: Charles Eugene Mitchell, III
Defendant: Reserve Officer Scott Harwell and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. Madison County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05065
Plaintiff: Justin Freeman
Defendant: Madison County, Arkansas and Lynn Whittle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cincoski v. Weatherington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02065
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Cincoski
Defendant: Dr. Weatherington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maskell v. Harrod
as 1:2023cv01047
Plaintiff: Adam Maskell
Defendant: Prosecuting Attorney David Harrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maskell v. Anderson
as 1:2023cv01046
Plaintiff: Adam Maskell
Defendant: Judge Bruce Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cleveland et al v. City of Centerton, Arkansas
as 5:2023cv05057
Plaintiff: Leandra Cleveland and Patrick Cleveland
Defendant: City of Centerton, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02043
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05082
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01029
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kumm v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2023cv05033
Plaintiff: Billie Kumm
Defendant: Deputy Hyrum Wheeler, Deputy Don King, Deputy Tyler Kell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?