Cases 1 - 10 of 198
Vicentic v. City of Hot Springs
as 6:2024cv06042
Plaintiff:
Dragan Vicentic
Defendant:
City of Hot Springs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Husbands v. Rowland et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Husbands
Defendant:
Shelly Rowland, Sabrina Williams, Scott Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. et al v. City of Lowell, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05229
Plaintiff:
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. and Metro Builders Supply of Rogers, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Arkansas, Chris Moore, Elizabeth Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crowson v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv04112
Plaintiff:
Russell Crowson
Defendant:
John Doe, Michael Kramm and City of Texarkana, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Sydnor v. City of Hot Springs, Arkansas et al
as 6:2023cv06081
Plaintiff:
David Sydnor
Defendant:
City of Hot Springs, Arkansas, Harmoney Morrisey, Lt. James Eric Stockwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cleveland et al v. City of Centerton, Arkansas
as 5:2023cv05057
Plaintiff:
Leandra Cleveland and Patrick Cleveland
Defendant:
City of Centerton, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
